-
My grandmother executed a registered WILL in favour of my uncle to enjoy the usufruct of her house as limited owner without any rights to alienate or transfer the house in any way to anybody.That there was a further term in the WILL that after the death of my uncle the said property will go to his son ,if any,otherwise the property would go to absolutely to other heirs. that after the death of my grandmother the WILL got probated by my uncle and started enjoying the same as per the direction of the WILL but after lapse of time my uncle sold away the house to Defendants.that when I came to know about this sale deed i filed a title suit and same was decided by a judgement holding inter alia,that the sale deed were void & not effective and the reversionary rights of the plaintiff is not effected & also that Geeta Agrawal was also not entitled to succeed to her husband and as such the plaintiff was declared to be immediate reversioner and that the plaintiff was entitled to the property as absolute owner. Against the judgement the defendant filed appeal which is still pending. The plaintiff filed another suit for a decree of vacant possession Against the defendant directing them to handover the suit property to the plaintiff.During course of final argument the defendants raised a matter that the suit be stayed as per section 10 of cpc,without filing any petition. the trial court on the court question that "whether the proceedings of this case be stayed?"after hearing both sides in length the court order that this suit shall not be stayed. Defendants filed a civil mis in high court and when the case is listed for admission the petitioner withdraw this application since according to him , the order which has been passed suo Moto by the court below and not an application filed on their behalf. the defendants filed a petition in the trial court of section 10 which is dismissed . Defendants again filed a civil mis. and on I.A. the high court stay the proceeding .pl.suggest that is it stayed under section 10 of C.P.C.