Check Bounce

Judgment of Trial Court is not final. Let the bank records summoned. Bank has not rejected cheque on that ground. So signature is genuine. Let the bank manager be summoned and examined as your witness. Second opinion is necessary.

send signature to expert, to get a second openion to compare with, the signature of the accused available on record, along with new specimen signature obtained in the open court

Only when seeing all papers, we can give exact suggestion.. anyhow some general things i.e 1) expert opinion is not final court may ignore and take its own view.. 2) u can ask for 2nd opinion..

Send it for second expert opinion.

Send the cheque for second opinion by filing a application before the Court, if such application is rejected, prefer appeal/revision. See that litigation shall continue otherwise it will be ended in acquittal.

what's your lawyer is doing?? Didn't he cross examine the expert?? I doubt.. but there are cases on this point

What was the reason written on the returned Bank memo for dishonor of cheque that needs to be seen. U have to prove there's legal debt due to accused n in lieu he offered this cheque

if u prove there is legal debt u will win case

u must prove that there is legal debt

even 138 is attracted